Here now after having shown it in bee vision and reflected ultraviolet photography that Cleo butterfly Gonepteryx cleopatra or Cleopatra, resting on a Rudbeckia hirta flower. Now here shown in normal visible as well as UV induced stimulated visible fluorescence, using various UV sources as well as blocking filters (BG38, Baader UV/IR CUT filter).
[click on image to see a larger one]
Visual image:
UV induced visible fluorescence using unfiltered commercial 365nm UV torch, no UV blocking:
UV induced visible fluorescence commercial 365nm UV torch, UV blocking:
UV induced visible fluorescence using Nichia 365nm UV torch, UV blocking:
UV induced visible fluorescence using UV filtered Nichia 365nm UV torch, UV blocking:
Nice results and a a lot of details on the wings gets visible using fluorescence method, yet personally I prefer reflected UV photography.
Stay tuned, more will follow on that fascinating subject...
More info on this very interesting field may be found on my site http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos
My BLOG about my journey into the invisible world of ultraviolet UV photography, simulated bee, butterfly and animal vision photography and the special lenses, filters and lighting needed to make it work - also in HD video + 3D stereo.
Friday, July 20, 2012
Gonepteryx cleopatra "Cleo" butterfly on Rudbeckia hirta: human vision vs simulated bee and butterfly vison; reflected UV ultraviolet photography
Today about a butterfly Gonepteryx cleopatra or Cleopatra, short "Cleo". So here it is in its multispectral representation, resting on a Rudbeckia hirta flower. I took some shots in normal human vision VIS, in UV using the Baader-U (eff. 375nm) and my Jupiter-U (eff. 365nm) and Saturn-U (eff. 325nm) filter, as well as in simulated bee and butterly vision using my XBV2 and XBV3 filters respectively.
I'm presenting all of them in diptych form, VIS image (left) vs filtered image (right)
[click on image to see a larger one]
VIS vs simulated insect vison using XBV2 filter:
VIS vs simulated insect vison using XBV3 filter:
VIS vs Baader-U (eff. 375nm):
VIS vs Jupiter-U (eff. 365nm):
VIS vs Saturn-U (eff. 325nm):
Quite interesting how that butterfly appears is different spectral representations. Obviously that spot as well as its UV bright rim around its wings is made to attract, which I made visible using my differential method (right):
As you may have noticed, I'm still working on my bee and butterfly vision (BV) filters. More about these special filters here later and in a seperate entry.
Stay tuned, more will follow on that fascinating subject...
More info on this very interesting field may be found on my site http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos
I'm presenting all of them in diptych form, VIS image (left) vs filtered image (right)
[click on image to see a larger one]
VIS vs simulated insect vison using XBV2 filter:
VIS vs simulated insect vison using XBV3 filter:
VIS vs Baader-U (eff. 375nm):
VIS vs Jupiter-U (eff. 365nm):
VIS vs Saturn-U (eff. 325nm):
Quite interesting how that butterfly appears is different spectral representations. Obviously that spot as well as its UV bright rim around its wings is made to attract, which I made visible using my differential method (right):
As you may have noticed, I'm still working on my bee and butterfly vision (BV) filters. More about these special filters here later and in a seperate entry.
Stay tuned, more will follow on that fascinating subject...
More info on this very interesting field may be found on my site http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos