Here again about the Soligor (also sold as Kyoei) f3.5 / 105mm, a quite capable lens for reflected UV photography I have written before here. This time in comparison with my all day UV lens, the CERCO 94mm quartz fluorite lens. I'm using a yellow/red Phalaenopsis flower for that and my "work horse" UV filter, the Baader-U filter plus the deeper reaching Jupiter-U filter. Light source was an UV enhanced Xenon flash. All shots done at f8 and presented on a side-a-side format for easier comparison, left the Soligor, right the CERCO lens.
[click on image to see a larger one]
Visible light image:
UV image using Baader-U filter (approx. 320-395nm, effective peak approx. 375nm):
UV image using Jupiter-U filter (approx. 280-385nm, effective peak approx. 365nm):
Also this comparison confirms, that it is a very sharp and seemingly deep into UV reaching lens, with only some 0.9% focal shift. Of course it does not reach as deep into UV as the CERCO lens, but nevertheless quite a useful lens!
Stay tuned, more will follow on that fascinating subject...
More info on this very interesting field may be found on my site http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos
My BLOG about my journey into the invisible world of ultraviolet UV photography, simulated bee, butterfly and animal vision photography and the special lenses, filters and lighting needed to make it work - also in HD video + 3D stereo.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Soligor / Kyoei 105mm lens for reflected UV photography
Today about the Soligor (also sold as Kyoei) f3.5 / 105mm, a quite capable lens for reflected UV photography, discovered a while ago by a forum colleague, who also discovered the Kuribayashi / Kyoei 35mm lens from the same lens family. I'm using a yellow/red Phalaenopsis flower for that and my "work horse" UV filter, the Baader-U filter plus the deeper reaching Jupiter-U filter. Light source was an UV enhanced Xenon flash. All shots done at f8 and presented on a side-a-side format for easier comparison.
[click on image to see a larger one]
Visible light image vs UV image using Baader-U filter (approx. 320-395nm, effective peak approx. 375nm):
Visible light image vs UV image using Jupiter-U filter (approx. 280-385nm, effective peak approx. 365nm):
UV images, Baader-U vs Jupiter-U filter:
A very sharp and seemingly deep into UV reaching lens, with only 0.9% focus shift. Quite a useful lens!
Stay tuned, more will follow on that fascinating subject...
More info on this very interesting field may be found on my site http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos
[click on image to see a larger one]
Visible light image vs UV image using Baader-U filter (approx. 320-395nm, effective peak approx. 375nm):
Visible light image vs UV image using Jupiter-U filter (approx. 280-385nm, effective peak approx. 365nm):
UV images, Baader-U vs Jupiter-U filter:
A very sharp and seemingly deep into UV reaching lens, with only 0.9% focus shift. Quite a useful lens!
Stay tuned, more will follow on that fascinating subject...
More info on this very interesting field may be found on my site http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos