[click on image to see a larger one]
Images showing on the left a visible light image and on the right using the Baader-U filter (approx. 320-395nm, effective peak approx. 375nm):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58859/588595df3118e520cbe70982aac7a4a68f5dc851" alt=""
UV images using shown on the left the Baader-U filter (approx. 320-395nm, effective peak approx. 375nm) and on the right my Jupiter-U filter (approx. 280-385nm, effective peak approx. 365nm):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f00e/5f00ead21a4fc1e58c29b2cb263282468e4908b8" alt=""
UV detail images using shown on the left the Baader-U filter (approx. 320-395nm, effective peak approx. 375nm) and on the right my Jupiter-U filter (approx. 280-385nm, effective peak approx. 365nm):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d6e5/5d6e575debb3d70ac953d255ebc1f766fb01a40d" alt=""
Transmission graph:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e54c4/e54c4cb55aa58c12a4a9bf456a2cd83cdaca1d2a" alt=""
Well, this little enlarger lens performs acceptably well, seemingly has quite a high UV transmission of about 80% and quite a deep reach into the UV region to about 320nm (white line), compared to my new standard 35mm lens (green line), the Kuribayashi 35mm. I also tested a rebadged version under a different moniker (pink line) which seems to perform about identical.
Stay tuned, more will follow on that fascinating subject...
More info on this very interesting field may be found on my site http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos